The Top Archaeological Discoveries of 2014

-
With 2014 having drawn to a close, I thought I'd post some links to various takes on the Top Archaeological discoveries of the year. 2014 was indeed an exciting year in archaeology worldwide!

The first is the annual list of the Top 10 Discoveries by the editors of Archaeology Magazine, a publication of the Archaeological Institute of America.

The second is a Top 10 List from the HeritageDaily website, compiled by an analysis of trending stories with the most site visits, in conjunction with the overall magnitude of the discovery.

There's also a Top 5 list from the DigVentures website, as well as a look back on The Year 2014 in Archaeology on the BBC website. Great to see some Polynesian archaeology getting a mention in the latter.

These lists comprise the year's most compelling discoveries, the ones that grabbed the news headlines. To paraphrase the editors of Archaeology Magazine, the Amphipolis tomb, which has been apparently dated to the time of the famed king Alexander the Great, is a prime example of archaeology captivating the public imagination. There has been much speculation about who the tomb may belong to, with suggestions that it may be one of Alexander's generals or relatives (Alexander himself was buried in Egypt, although the exact location remains a mystery). Even the results of a detailed analysis of a skeleton found within the tomb, to be announced later this month, will likely not allow a definite identification of the tomb's occupant.


The excavation of the Amphipolis Tomb in Greece is a prime example of an archaeological project capturing the public imagination in 2014! 


Headline grabbing finds such as those in the lists linked above represent an extremely small proportion of all archaeology done. While I will definitely be keenly following the headline grabbing discoveries of 2015, my hope is that this blog will also provide a more balanced insight into the world of archaeology through my own experiences and reflections.


Thanks for reading,

Nick.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Importance of Context in Archaeology

-
Image
In my last post I mentioned the importance of context to archaeological research. That is, knowing PRECISELY where an object was found and its relationship to other objects in the archaeological record.  The goal of archaeology is to understand past human behaviour and how that behaviour changes over time. The primary (and in some cases, the only!) source of evidence available to help achieve this goal is the archaeological record, or the material record of that behaviour. So, how do archaeologists get from ruins, pieces of dirty stone and pottery and patterns of dark patches in the soil to an understanding of human behaviour in the past and how this changes over time? This is where context is important!   To recap from the last post - Excavation, the principal method of data acquisition in archaeology, involves the systematic uncovering of archaeological remains through the removal of the deposits of soil and other material covering them and accompanying them. Two types of infor
Read more

Motupore Island continued

-
Image
The following is a slightly edited version of a report I originally wrote for PAST, the newsletter of the Prehistoric Society , which provided me with some funding to attend the Motupore Island excavation in Papua New Guinea in 2016. This did not end up appearing in PAST, so I thought I would post it here. In June 2016 the University of Papua New Guinea (UPNG) ran an archaeological field school on Motupore Island, Papua New Guinea (PNG). Because my research as a graduate student at the University of Otago had looked at the archaeology of sites and regions thought to be linked to Motupore Island, I was invited to attend as an overseas student. A short report on the excavation follows.  Motupore Island in Bootless Bay is a small, waterless island located some 16km east of Port Moresby, the national capital of PNG. The island is about 800m long, 275m wide at its widest point, and rising to a maximum 61.4m above sea level. On the protected northern (shoreward) end of the island, a cuspat
Read more

Problems with Prehistory

-
Within archaeology, prehistory has a fairly straightforward meaning: prior to recorded (i.e. written down) history. In theory, the use of this term within the field to describe a time period in the past is free of value judgments. The key distinction between prehistoric and historical archaeology is one of differences in the resources that are available to archaeologists when trying to piece together peoples' behaviour in the past. In both cases, we are interested in the material remains of that behaviour. That is, in a nutshell, the definition of archaeology: the investigation of the human past by the study of the material remains left behind. British archaeologist Stuart Piggott once called archaeology 'the science of rubbish' because it predominantly involves the study of things that people have thrown away. Historical Archaeology In historical archaeology the study of material remains is complemented by the study of historical records - whether they be written histo
Read more