NZAA Conference 2016 (Part 1)

-
Kia ora,

I've just recently gotten back from this year's New Zealand Archaeological Association conference held in Blenheim (up the top of the east coast of NZ's South Island) last week. Our hosts for the conference were the local tangata whenua, Rangitāne O Wairau.

The destination of a mid-conference field trip was the Wairau Bar, the location of the earliest known archaeological site in New Zealand, with occupation dated to ca. 1300 AD. 

Wairau Bar was the location of excavations undertaken around the middle of the 20th century by researchers from the Canterbury Museum, which resulted in the recovery of a rich range of artefacts and human remains (kōiwi) from a number of burials and their relocation to the museum. Unsurprisingly, the holding of the kōiwi from the Wairau Bar at the Canterbury Museum remained an especially sore point for Rangitāne O Wairau for many years. 

In 2008, Rangitāne signed a memorandum of understanding with Canterbury Museum and the University of Otago, guaranteeing the return of the kōiwi (which were reinterred the following year), while also allowing some scientific research on the remains and further study of the site. The hosting of the 2016 NZAA Conference by Rangitāne O Wairau at their newly built conference centre was a significant step forward in the process of healing.

More about the most recent research into Wairau Bar, headed by archaeologists at the University of Otago, can be found here. 

More on the conference itself shortly!

A large, stone-lined hāngi (earth oven) at Wairau Bar, excavated in 2009. Image has been sourced from the Southern Pacific Archaeological Research (SPAR) website here.



  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Importance of Context in Archaeology

-
Image
In my last post I mentioned the importance of context to archaeological research. That is, knowing PRECISELY where an object was found and its relationship to other objects in the archaeological record.  The goal of archaeology is to understand past human behaviour and how that behaviour changes over time. The primary (and in some cases, the only!) source of evidence available to help achieve this goal is the archaeological record, or the material record of that behaviour. So, how do archaeologists get from ruins, pieces of dirty stone and pottery and patterns of dark patches in the soil to an understanding of human behaviour in the past and how this changes over time? This is where context is important!   To recap from the last post - Excavation, the principal method of data acquisition in archaeology, involves the systematic uncovering of archaeological remains through the removal of the deposits of soil and other material covering them and accompanying them. Two ...
Read more

Problems with Prehistory

-
Within archaeology, prehistory has a fairly straightforward meaning: prior to recorded (i.e. written down) history. In theory, the use of this term within the field to describe a time period in the past is free of value judgments. The key distinction between prehistoric and historical archaeology is one of differences in the resources that are available to archaeologists when trying to piece together peoples' behaviour in the past. In both cases, we are interested in the material remains of that behaviour. That is, in a nutshell, the definition of archaeology: the investigation of the human past by the study of the material remains left behind. British archaeologist Stuart Piggott once called archaeology 'the science of rubbish' because it predominantly involves the study of things that people have thrown away. Historical Archaeology In historical archaeology the study of material remains is complemented by the study of historical records - whether they be written histo...
Read more

Motupore Island continued

-
Image
The following is a slightly edited version of a report I originally wrote for PAST, the newsletter of the Prehistoric Society , which provided me with some funding to attend the Motupore Island excavation in Papua New Guinea in 2016. This did not end up appearing in PAST, so I thought I would post it here. In June 2016 the University of Papua New Guinea (UPNG) ran an archaeological field school on Motupore Island, Papua New Guinea (PNG). Because my research as a graduate student at the University of Otago had looked at the archaeology of sites and regions thought to be linked to Motupore Island, I was invited to attend as an overseas student. A short report on the excavation follows.  Motupore Island in Bootless Bay is a small, waterless island located some 16km east of Port Moresby, the national capital of PNG. The island is about 800m long, 275m wide at its widest point, and rising to a maximum 61.4m above sea level. On the protected northern (shoreward) end of the island, a cu...
Read more